statements ยท statement-BATCH-2026-006-002
source-BATCH-2026-005-001
The authors conclude that established cybersecurity practice remains useful for agents but needs modification for agent-specific risks.
Statement context
- Statement type
- interpretation
- Exact source locator
- Official HTML publication page, Abstract, sentence 5, accessed 2026-08-15
- Source date
- 2026-05-18
- Role at source time
- authors of the NIST RFI response synthesis
- Evidence character
- author interpretation
- Scope
- The NIST authors' synthesis of the RFI response corpus.
Recorded uncertainty: The public page does not disclose the underlying coding method or quantify support.
Indexed source: Summary Analysis of Responses to the Request for Information Regarding Security Considerations for AI Agents
Evidence lineage and transparency
| Relationship field | Linked identifiers |
|---|---|
| topic ids | topic-ai-agents, topic-ai-governance, topic-cybersecurity, topic-non-human-identity |
Machine review: machine checked. Human review: approved. Workflow: published.
Complete structured record
- statement id
- statement-BATCH-2026-006-002
- source id
- source-BATCH-2026-005-001
- person id
- Unknown
- institutional author
- NIST Center for AI Standards and Innovation
- book edition id
- Unknown
- speaker role at source time
- authors of the NIST RFI response synthesis
- organization at source time
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- statement type
- interpretation
- neutral paraphrase
- The authors conclude that established cybersecurity practice remains useful for agents but needs modification for agent-specific risks.
- direct quote
- Unknown
- direct quote rights note
- Unknown
- exact locator
- Official HTML publication page, Abstract, sentence 5, accessed 2026-08-15
- locator type
- html_section
- source date
- 2026-05-18
- topic ids
- topic-ai-agents, topic-ai-governance, topic-cybersecurity, topic-non-human-identity
- executive role context
- role-ciso, role-cio, role-cto, role-general-counsel, role-board-director
- industry context
- cross-sector
- geographic context
- United States, global issues discussed
- evidence character
- author_interpretation
- factual verification status
- attribution_verified
- statement scope
- The NIST authors' synthesis of the RFI response corpus.
- uncertainty
- The public page does not disclose the underlying coding method or quantify support.
- extraction method
- Machine-assisted close reading of the exact verified source version; original neutral paraphrase; human review pending.
- machine extraction confidence
- 0.95
- independent agent review status
- not_started
- publication status
- published
- workflow status
- published
- machine review status
- machine_checked
- human review status
- approved
- reviewed by
- Murray Newlands
- reviewed at
- 2026-08-16T23:17:22Z
Provenance and revision history
{
"provenance": [
{
"source_url": "https://www.nist.gov/publications/summary-analysis-responses-request-information-regarding-security-considerations-ai",
"accessed_at": "2026-08-15",
"retrieval_method": "Exact verified source version inherited from BATCH-2026-005 and statement-level close reading",
"exact_locator": "Official HTML publication page, Abstract, sentence 5, accessed 2026-08-15",
"content_hash": "32c07aeeb8f49694dd407080eab757c905dc4395871b52edd46a113208064a03",
"batch_id": "BATCH-2026-006",
"prompt_id": "OEII-STATEMENT-CODING",
"prompt_version": "2.0",
"notes": "Source eligibility inherited from source-BATCH-2026-005-001; human attribution and publication review pending."
}
],
"revision_history": [
{
"changed_at": "2026-08-16T23:17:22Z",
"changed_by": "Murray Newlands",
"summary": "Approved for the governed-identities pilot release under the exact scope, exclusions, rights treatment, and limitations recorded in issue #18.",
"batch_id": "BATCH-2026-006"
}
]
}