statements ยท statement-BATCH-2026-006-035

source-BATCH-2026-005-008

The two evaluated open-source backbones and the ZAP and Metasploit scanner baseline did not exploit any benchmark vulnerability.

Statement context

Statement type
empirical finding
Exact source locator
arXiv:2406.01637v2 PDF pp. 1 and 5, Abstract and Figures 2-3
Source date
2024-06-02
Role at source time
joint authors of the HPTSA paper
Evidence character
primary empirical result
Scope
The named systems on the study's 14 selected vulnerabilities.

Recorded uncertainty: A zero result in this small benchmark is not evidence of zero capability elsewhere.

Indexed source: Teams of LLM Agents can Exploit Zero-Day Vulnerabilities

Evidence lineage and transparency

Relationship fieldLinked identifiers
topic idstopic-ai-agents, topic-ai-governance, topic-cybersecurity, topic-non-human-identity

Machine review: machine checked. Human review: approved. Workflow: published.

Complete structured record
statement id
statement-BATCH-2026-006-035
source id
source-BATCH-2026-005-008
person id
Unknown
institutional author
Zhu et al. (joint paper authors)
book edition id
Unknown
speaker role at source time
joint authors of the HPTSA paper
organization at source time
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
statement type
empirical_finding
neutral paraphrase
The two evaluated open-source backbones and the ZAP and Metasploit scanner baseline did not exploit any benchmark vulnerability.
direct quote
Unknown
direct quote rights note
Unknown
exact locator
arXiv:2406.01637v2 PDF pp. 1 and 5, Abstract and Figures 2-3
locator type
pdf_page
source date
2024-06-02
topic ids
topic-ai-agents, topic-ai-governance, topic-cybersecurity, topic-non-human-identity
executive role context
role-ciso, role-cio, role-cto, role-general-counsel, role-board-director
industry context
cross-sector
geographic context
synthetic sandbox; no human geography
evidence character
primary_empirical_result
factual verification status
source_reported_not_independently_verified
statement scope
The named systems on the study's 14 selected vulnerabilities.
uncertainty
A zero result in this small benchmark is not evidence of zero capability elsewhere.
extraction method
Machine-assisted close reading of the exact verified source version; original neutral paraphrase; human review pending.
machine extraction confidence
0.94
independent agent review status
not_started
publication status
published
workflow status
published
machine review status
machine_checked
human review status
approved
reviewed by
Murray Newlands
reviewed at
2026-08-16T23:17:22Z
Provenance and revision history
{
  "provenance": [
    {
      "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01637",
      "accessed_at": "2026-08-15",
      "retrieval_method": "Exact verified source version inherited from BATCH-2026-005 and statement-level close reading",
      "exact_locator": "arXiv:2406.01637v2 PDF pp. 1 and 5, Abstract and Figures 2-3",
      "content_hash": "f4fc06040f0856d99d2009042b4c6fa0c01206da8ca61cb39a94d52b9867cf71",
      "batch_id": "BATCH-2026-006",
      "prompt_id": "OEII-STATEMENT-CODING",
      "prompt_version": "2.0",
      "notes": "Source eligibility inherited from source-BATCH-2026-005-008; human attribution and publication review pending."
    }
  ],
  "revision_history": [
    {
      "changed_at": "2026-08-16T23:17:22Z",
      "changed_by": "Murray Newlands",
      "summary": "Approved for the governed-identities pilot release under the exact scope, exclusions, rights treatment, and limitations recorded in issue #18.",
      "batch_id": "BATCH-2026-006"
    }
  ]
}

Open machine-readable record